The recent news item about the discovery of a fossil nicknamed ‘Ida’ and claims that the discovery proves to be the ‘missing link’ that proves evolution is true, is so unscientific that it is just madness. I’m amazed that normally intelligent people make such statements.
Do those who claim it is a missing link really believe that giving it a human name such as Ida and pointing out a handful of features such as baby teeth, opposable big toe, finger tips and nails that humans have proves their point?
A report in the Wall Street Journal had this to say: ‘Several of its features can be commonly seen in modern-day primates, including baby teeth and an opposable big toe. Instead of claws, “she’s got fingertips with nails like we do,” said Jorn Hurum of the Natural History Museum in Oslo, who led the research’. Yet the pictures show an animal that looks very much like a cat rather than a human. Of course, many scientists claim that it isn’t a missing link but the people who do must be desperate!
What amazes me even more is that a well known natural history broadcaster really believes it is a missing link on such limited ‘evidence’.
Why can’t broadcasters and scientists take the evidence of the human body (and the whole of nature for that matter) for what it is and see that rather than proving evolution, it actually proves design and therefore needs a designer. I recently purchased a small publication that shows this very clearly. In God’s Image is written by Stuart Burgess, a design engineer.

Now I must admit that many Christians do themselves a disservice by claiming that the whole universe was created only 6,000 years ago. The Bible doesn’t say that. It just says ‘in the beginning’. It goes on to say in most English translations that the “earth WAS without form and void”. But the Hebrew original could just as easily have been translated as “the earth BECAME without form and void” (emphasis mine). Most Bible Dictionaries will explain this. So Adam and Eve may have been created around 6,000 years ago, but the universe was created many millions of years before that and the evidence is that there were creatures on the Earth BEFORE Adam and Eve, but that in a great catastrophe they were destroyed. One of the best books I’ve seen explaining this is “The First Genesis: A New Case For Creation” by William F. Dankenbring. Creationists would have a much sounder argument if they took the Bible literally instead of reading into it their preconceived ideas.
————————————————–
Filed under: ALL POSTS, Bible & Christianity, books, creation and evolution | Tagged: ALL POSTS, Bible & Christianity, books, creation and evolution | Leave a Comment »